Date: 4/10/24 6:09 pm
From: Kimball Garrett <cyanolyca818...>
Subject: [LACoBirds] A common (and easily fixed) eBird error
Compose:
Draft saved
[image: Minimize][image: Pop-out][image: Close]

Birders:

[Please ignore if you don't use eBird]

I have noticed that many eBirders do not seem to grasp how to enter
subspecies on their eBird lists. Here is an example:
In your birding, you encounter and identify 20 "Audubon's" Yellow-rumped
Warblers and 2 "Myrtle" Yellow-rumped Warblers.

Your eBird list should therefore show:
--- Yellow-rumped Warbler
2 Yellow-rumped Warbler (Myrtle)
20 Yellow-rumped Warbler (Audubon's)

But many eBirders enter it like this:
22 Yellow-rumped Warbler
2 Yellow-rumped Warbler (Myrtle)
20 Yellow-rumped Warbler (Audubon's)

This is wrong, since your list now shows 44 Yellow-rumped Warblers total
when in fact you only found 22 of them.

Of course, it may not be possible to identify all individuals encountered
to subspecies. ,So if you found 20 "Audubon's," 2 "Myrtles," and 10 other
Yellow-rumped Warblers that could not be identified to subspecies, you
would enter it as:
10 Yellow-rumped Warbler
2 Yellow-rumped Warbler (Myrtle)
20 Yellow-rumped Warbler (Audubon's)

In summary, if you list a bird to subspecies, then DO NOT also include that
bird under the "umbrella" species name. Seems obvious, but many birders do
this incorrectly. If you have been doing this incorrectly, please take the
time to go back and correct your lists.

Remember that you can toggle on/off the button that says "Show Subspecies"
when you enter an eBird list. If you elect to show (and enter) subspecies,
then please enter them conservatively (very few subspecies in our area are
readily identifiable in the field). It is our bias (as reviewers) that if
there is only one subspecies possible in the region [e.g., "Brown Pelican
(California)"] you should only enter your observation to the species level
unless you carefully examined characters that allowed you to identify the
subspecies. [How many of you who enter Brown Pelicans in our area to
subspecies actually studied them carefully to rule out, for example, the
subspecies *carolinensis* from the Gulf of Mexico or *occidentalis* from
the West Indies, which are not part of the "California: subspecies group?]

Thanks,

Kimball Garrett (for the L. A. County eBIrd reviewer team)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#4142): https://groups.io/g/LACoBirds/message/4142
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105454749/858290
-=-=-
Unsubscribe: mailto:<LACoBirds-unsubscribe...>
Website: https://groups.io/g/LACoBirds/
Listowners: mailto:<LACoBirds-owner...>
-=-=-
Group Owner: LACoBirds+<owner...>
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/LACoBirds/unsub [<lists...>]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-



 
Join us on Facebook!