Date: 1/13/21 12:33 pm
From: Julien McCarthy <jbm...>
Subject: RE: NC Seabirds
Mighty helpful research and truth telling here BUT:

The people in our culture/society have recently revealed astonishing numbers of citizens not only rejecting scientific truths but demonstrating contempt/denial for science itself. Logic, research, data, the scientific method are maligned in favor of emotional knee jerking decisions/actions. This does and will have a profound effect on wildlife preservation programs. I have witnessed intentional destruction of Tern nesting sites at the NC OBX in protest of dune closures.

Perhaps a broad approach to education will turn these people into supporters once they understand the “ truth” .

You are “ doing the right thing”

May the force be with you

From: <carolinabirds-request...> <carolinabirds-request...> On Behalf Of <badgerboy...>
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:47 PM
To: <carolinabirds...>
Subject: Re: NC Seabirds

Please excuse the soapbox, and click "delete" now if only interested in rare bird sightings.

I checked the link provided about the cormorant killing ("culling") in PA. Very difficult to say whats going on there, but it seems likely to be a great example of exactly the kind of scapegoating I was warning about.

They start by demonizing cormorants because of their appearance and numbers, describing them as "an all-black seabird that has risen from once-obscure numbers here to a genuine pain in the butt".

They then cite vague and unsubstantiated worries about negative impacts on other wildlife, stating that "Cormorants don't take over the egret and heron nests or plunder the eggs. But they are taking up the available trees for their own stick nests" and "Moreover, studies show the droppings of cormorants can kill trees." (Emphasis my own) There seems to be no direct causal evidence of harm provided, and not even any indirect evidence that I can see.

Finally they throw in purported economic harm as a clincher, with "Certainly, cormorants have become the bane of many anglers because they eat fish. They raid fish hatcheries and commercial aquaculture operations. Their burgeoning numbers have had negative impacts on vegetation."

This one small instance of wildlife targeting is not likely in itself to have any impact whatsoever on overall cormorant numbers or ecosystem function. It might even have a very small and positive local influence on heron and egret numbers. What is problematic is the complete dismissal of any possible positive role in the ecosystem, the absence any acknowledgment that wildlife has a job to do, a valuable feedback function to perform, and the narrow focus on the negatives, which justify people's innate urge to control. I think the real danger is that public attitudes and psychology, which are already slanted against wildlife, will be reinforced and amplified by this official sanction for violence against wildlife.

End soapbox. Guy McGrane, Boone, NC

Join us on Facebook!