Date: 12/30/20 3:09 pm From: 'pat j' via Birders <birders...> Subject: Re: [birders] Orion Magazine | 9 Rules for the Woke Birdwatcher
When we send an email to this list server, we send it to <birders...>,not <My_Agenda...>! I agree with Bill, I think we need to get backto bird related subjects on this list server and check the other subjects atthe door! We are not always going to agree with everyone else about everysubject so why not share the birding activities and reports that we all enjoyand let it go at that. Ultimately, I guess it's up to the administrator of thissite as to what will be allowed and what will not be tolerated. Usually when Isee posts like this I hit the delete button, I think it's a shame we have to trudgethrough all the minutiae to get to the heart of what this site was initially intendedto be… a place to share our passion of birding! Patrick J.
On Wednesday, December 30, 2020, 04:48:53 PM EST, 'THOMAS HODGSON' via Birders <birders...> wrote:
Well said Bill!
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 30, 2020, at 4:24 PM, 'Bill Sonnett' via Birders <birders...> wrote:
This group was designed to bring folks with like interest (in this case bird watching) together. Strongly expressed opinions on almost any other subject (cats, guns, eating meat, abortion, religion, politics, etc. etc.) in the end will divide us. That is why there are other groups that specialize in these types of debates. I am 77 and have been watching birds all my life and have many friends who enjoy the hobby with me. Almost all disagree with each other on some subject, but we get together to celebrate our like interest. Most have the maturity to leave their differences aside and treat everyone with respect and enjoy what we have in common. With that being said, my vote is to stick with birds.
William Sonnett, Jackson, Michigan
On Wednesday, December 30, 2020, 03:12:39 PM EST, <ibblazin...> <ibblazin...> wrote:
Thank you, Josh, for being the voice of reason. I agree that if one opinion needs to be honored, all should be. I agree with Patrick. I also agree with other posters who say all birders or, more appropriately, all people deserve courtesy and respect and that discussions about race are important. I just don’t think this board is the place to have them or that it should be used to promote one’s social agenda. As for “if you don’t like the post, don’t read it”, that’s nearly impossible. I don’t know what the post is about until I read it and, once read, it can’t be un-read if it’s objectionable to me. I subscribe to Birders to learn about/find news about birds. There are plenty of other forums for posting links and having discussions about social issues. Can we please stick to birds and the occasional butterfly?
From: Joshua Haas <joshuahaas...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:55 PM
To: Lisa Lava-Kellar <lisalk...>
Cc: Marta Manildi <mamanildi...>; Jchordash <jchordash...>; Allen Chartier <amazilia3...>; birders <birders...>
Subject: Re: [birders] Orion Magazine | 9 Rules for the Woke Birdwatcher
Those speaking positively about the article are sharing their opinion no differently than the “PB” who posted their opinion. Just because you may not agree with the person doesn’t mean they can’t have an opinion. They wondered if this was the right place for the article. The list owner decided it was. Seems done to me.
On Dec 30, 2020, at 14:15, Lisa Lava-Kellar <lisalk...> wrote:
I completely agree with those of you who have spoken up about the odd and recent message from PB.
Thanks to each of you for sharing your thoughts. I wholeheartedly support each of your sentiments.
On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 9:47 AM 'Marta Manildi' via Birders <birders...> wrote:
I loved the post and appreciated it. The introduction to Orion Magazine was an added bonus.
On Dec 30, 2020, at 12:05 AM, Jchordash <jchordash...> wrote:
Thank for expressing my sentiments. You said it better than I could.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Allen Chartier <amazilia3...> wrote:
I have been on this list for perhaps 2 decades. From the beginning, it has never been appropriate to complain to the entire list about what may or may not be within the (rather broad) guidelines of the list. Those inquiries are always to be addressed only to the listowner.
The posting in question merely provided a link that can be visited, or not, without providing any commentary on the content. Responses to this post, including mine, expressed approval and interest in the content, but did not share any details of that content. So, what could possibly be objectionable about that?
The content at the link discusses, among other things, how we should understand our fellow birders, appreciate the feelings and experiences of our fellow birders, understand how history has affected our fellow birders, explore ways to improve relationships with our fellow birders, and how we should respect our fellow birders. Anyone can disagree with these points of course, but specific arguments should be made on the content, not by attempts to shut these important conversations down.
Birders is a service of the Great Lakes Commission. Visit us at www.glc.org
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Birders" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to birders+<unsubscribe...>