Date: 10/8/19 5:21 pm
From: <whoffman...>
Subject: [obol] Re: Limits on the interpretation of detail in bird records
If the third point in Fun fact #1 is true, then Fun fact #3 is a mathematical necessity.

Wayne


From: "Mike Patterson" <celata...>
To: "obol" <obol...>
Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 4:44:16 PM
Subject: [obol] Re: Limits on the interpretation of detail in bird records

Fun fact#1
18.5% of all Oregon eBird checklist are produced by the top 10 users
37.6% by the top 50 users
50% by the top 100 users

Fun fact#2
I'm in the top 20% of eBird users

Fun fact#3
There are way more than 100 birders in Oregon...

--
Mike Patterson
Astoria, OR
Lies, Damned Lies and Statistical Significance
http://www.surfbirds.com/community-blogs/northcoastdiaries/?p=3761
POST: Send your post to <obol...>
UNSUBSCRIBE: //www.freelists.org/list/obol
OBOL archives: www.freelists.org/archive/obol
Contact moderator: <obol-moderators...>

 
Join us on Facebook!