Date: 10/6/19 7:01 pm
From: George Neavoll <gneavoll...>
Subject: [obol] Re: Noah Strycker Nat Geo
And the problem is? This is carrying touchy-ness to the extreme, it seems to me. I follow both OBOL and Tweeters, and this is the kind of discussion that never would occur on Tweeters. Nobody would think of it.

George Neavoll
S.W. Portland

> On Oct 6, 2019, at 6:46 PM, Alan Contreras <acontrer56...> wrote:
>
> I think Wayne’s approach is right. Fine to refer people to the article as Noah is One of Us. This is his first-ever article for NG and is thus a big deal for the Oregon birding family.
>
> Cats and falconry are topics excluded from OBOL because they will start endless, er, catfights. Thanks for respecting this custom.
>
>
> Alan Contreras
> <acontrer56...> <mailto:<acontrer56...>
> Eugene, Oregon
>
> www.alanlcontreras.com <http://www.alanlcontreras.com/>
>
> Nostalgic for Nixon….
>
>
>
>
>> On Oct 6, 2019, at 6:40 PM, <whoffman...> <mailto:<whoffman...> wrote:
>>
>> Pointing out the existence of this article should be OK(?)
>>
>> However by OBOL rules this is a prohibited topic. Any further discussion should be moved to BOO.
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> From: <rriparia...> <mailto:<rriparia...>
>> To: "obol" <obol...>
>> Sent: Sunday, October 6, 2019 7:33:40 PM
>> Subject: [obol] Noah Strycker Nat Geo
>>
>> Maybe I missed someone mentioning this, or maybe not...
>>
>> I read an article by Noah Strycker, regarding cats, which included impacts on bird population, in latest National Geographic.
>>
>> Kevin Spencer
>> Klamath Falls, OR
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon LG Smartphone
>>
>


 
Join us on Facebook!