Date: 9/23/19 9:51 pm From: Roger Kuhlman <rkuhlman...> Subject: RE: [birders] Decline of the North American avifauna - "3 billion birds" paper
I am very sorry to point out the basic ecological truth concerning the present loss of biodiversity and climate change that it ecologically impossible to have 7.7 billion people in the World all consuming at average American consumption levels let alone 10 to 11 billion in 2100. Expect much more species extinctions, biodiversity and natural habitat loss in the future.
I would also point out that I did not say that rich American White Men and Evil Greedy American corporations have no responsibility for North American bird loss only that they are not responsible for a majority or even most of it. Some powerful political interests including many corporations in America want to spin it this way to advance their own political control and economic self-interests of building Big Federal Government-Corporation alliances. These are the people that are happy to see fast population growth continue in America and the American population grow to 500 to 600 million by 2100 through Mass Immigration. I ask you if America is a mess environmentally today, how will having 500 to 600 million people in 2100 make it richer in biodiversity and natural habitats. Clearly It Will Not.
From: John Lowry <john...>
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 11:04:09 PM
To: Roger Kuhlman <rkuhlman...>
Cc: Don Burlett <baikalteal13...>; Birders UM <birders...>
Subject: Re: [birders] Decline of the North American avifauna - "3 billion birds" paper
I don’t think you wonder about that at all. In fact, I don’t recall a single instance where you’ve even tangentially implicated corporate greed, illegal activity, or environmental attacks for a single bird death.
As for me, I blame these losses on any and all human enterprises. I’m not excusing Rich American White Men nor am I excusing Evil Greedy American Corporations, any more than I’m ignoring the attacks on female reproductive choices by the modern neo-conservative movement, or prior generations’ slaughter of pigeons, auks, dodos, or moas. I blame these losses on large families and small families. I blame these extinctions on human endeavor both careless and thoughtless, as well as purposeful. We should know better now, and yet there is a major American political party dedicated, almost single-mindedly at this point, to removing obstacles for corporations to plunder natural resources and accelerate extinctions. This party is largely serving at the behest of Rich American White Men and Evil Greedy American Corporations.
Rich people have more power than poor people. Corporations have more power than individuals. If we are to slow this current decline of biodiversity it’s going to take major efforts to get rich people and corporations to be better environmental leaders. If they won’t do it of their own accord, then they must be legislated into a corner that prevents them from acting against biodiversity.
I wonder if the ecological problem of Human Overpopulation through its intrinsic mechanisms of Human Overconsumption of natural resources and severe developmental impacts on the biosphere has caused this rather drastic decline of North American birds over the last 50 years? I rather doubt we can blame these losses on birdlife on a few very powerful Rich American White Men or Evil Greedy American Corporations.
This summary of reports about bird loss shows a very wide distribution. It includes some analysis of the original paper. Checkout the list of sources included and the analysis of the work. Hopefully, a few "civilians" will pay attention.