Date: 11/8/18 4:14 pm
From: Gmail <butchchq8...>
Subject: Re: Whooping crane
Dan,

Could you be more specific in that regard? One could argue that at current rate of decline, decade over decade, that very few species are actually self-sustaining, thus the need for conservation. If they were, why bother?

> On Nov 8, 2018, at 18:06, Daniel Scheiman <birddan...> wrote:
>
> Nope, it isn’t countable because it isn’t from a self-sustaining population. Karen’s original post’s subject line is “Captive-Reared Whooping Crane in Monroe Co.” and she says "L4-17 a female Whooping Crane from the Experimental Whooping Crane Population established in Coastal Louisiana.”
>
> Dan Scheiman
> Little Rock
>
> On 11/8/18, 3:27 PM, "The Birds of Arkansas Discussion List on behalf of James Dixon" <ARBIRD-L...> on behalf of <jamesdixonlr...> wrote:
>
> I think he probably is. He's not penned or anything and came to Arkansas on his own didn't he?
>
>
>
>
> Jim Dixon
> Little Rock
> www.jamesdixon.us
> "There is nothing like looking, if you want to find something. You certainly usually find something, if you look, but it is not always quite the something you were after." — Thorin
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Sandy Berger <sndbrgr...>
> Date: 11/8/18 14:18 (GMT-06:00)
> To: <ARBIRD-L...>
> Subject: Whooping crane
>
> This guy isn't countable, right?
>
> Sandy B.

 
Join us on Facebook!