Date: 11/6/18 6:41 am From: Hal Michael <ucd880...> Subject: Re: [Tweeters] Little stint at Neah Bay NOT
I would add that Dennis gave a long explanation as to the whys of the initial ID and the subsequent changes. Too often we see "It doesn't look like (Paterson, Sibley, etc)" or "Merlin says....". Birds, and other living things, are much more complex. I am so happy that year's ago Dennis, and others, got me to look at and appreciate the individual. While we're (I'm) talking about field guides, some of the photos in filed guides are mis-labeled......
Science Outreach Director, Sustainable Fisheries Foundation
> On November 6, 2018 at 5:08 AM Matt Bartels <mattxyz...> wrote:
> I for one am glad you posted originally and especially glad you spoke up when the bird morphed in the photos into something else. It’s always good to have a Neah Bay excuse, and hopefully everyone who ventured out there still had a great time. We need more people posting sightings and then being willing to post reconsiderations — one of the downsides of the ‘eBird culture’ of late, in my opinion, is that rescinding sighting claims just fade away w/o comment too often.
> Thanks Dennis!
> Matt Bartels
> Seattle, WA
> > On Nov 5, 2018, at 2:17 PM, Dennis Paulson <dennispaulson...> wrote:
> > Hello tweeters,
> > I can’t say how embarrassed I am. I took around 130 photos of the bird I identified as a Little Stint at Neah Bay on Friday, and I hadn’t had the chance to look closely at them until this afternoon. Having watched it for minutes at a time in a scope, I would have bet a lot of money that there were no webs on the toes, my ultimate field mark to be certain of the identity. But my photos say otherwise, as I can see small webs on a few of them where the feet are just in the right position. Of all the stints, only Western and Semipalmated Sandpipers have basal toe webbing.
> > It was a bird in full juvenile plumage, not a trace of molt into first-winter, and a Western in juvenile plumage in early November was astonishing to me, as they usually begin the molt into first-basic plumage in September and are finished with it in October. Such a plumage at the beginning of November might be astonishing for a Little Stint as well, but that’s why I looked much more closely at the bird. It was at the very bright end of the variation in color in juvenile Western Sandpipers, much more richly marked with rufous than any other of the many photos I have of the species. It was obviously a male, with a bill short enough to be possible for a Little Stint.
> > My only excuse is that my inclination would have been to come home with the photos and make sure of what I had seen, but I felt a tremendous pressure to report the bird so other birders who had the time could come out there and possibly see it. Tacoma sent quite a few of them, and my apologies for stimulating those who came to make that long drive. I can only hope you saw enough of the splendid avifauna of Neah Bay to have made the drive worthwhile.
> > Dennis Paulson
> > Chagrined in Seattle
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tweeters mailing list
> > <Tweeters...>
> > http://mailman11.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters >
> Tweeters mailing list
> http://mailman11.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters _______________________________________________ Tweeters mailing list <Tweeters...> http://mailman11.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters