Date: 5/1/18 6:28 am From: Bill Thurman <bill.masterofmusic...> Subject: Re: Rachael Carson and "enviro-fascists"
I'll make my comments as brief as possible. The human race is on a
collision course with Reality, worse than any "asteroid " that they could
have ever dreamed of. With 8 billion and more coming they will have gone
beyond the pale. They ("we") are now the ultimate junk species. All birds
are sacred compared with a species like "us". When the numbers have spun
further out of control than they are now, wildlife and rare species will be
devastated to a point that makes "now" look mild. The most horrifying
plagues of new diseases, wars and environmental breakdowns will occur and
the earth will be littered with dead humans everywhere, thereby bringing
some relief to all the madness. Somehow the earth will survive "us" but
it's a gigantic question whether "we" will survive the hell that we've made
of the earth. That's all for now, folks.
Bluewater Bill - Bill Thurman
PS you can sanctimoniously criticize all you want. I don't give a damn.
On Tue, May 1, 2018, 08:01 Judy & Don <9waterfall9...> wrote:
> Thank you for that, DeLynn. Of course that is also my understanding, but I
> am surrounded by people whose interpretation is quite the opposite.
> On Apr 30, 2018, at 11:04 PM, Warbling Vireo <0000001d24760ffa-
> <dmarc-request...> wrote:
> My own (Christian) study of the Bible brings me to the conclusion that the
> God of my understanding expects environmental stewardship. One of the
> clearest, most succinct verses on that is Leviticus
> <https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Leviticus> 25:23
> "The land must not be sold permanently, because the land is mine and you
> are but aliens and my tenants."
> Now back specifically to birds.
> D. DeLynn Hearn
> 317 West K Ave.
> N. Little Rock, AR 72116
> On Apr 30, 2018, at 9:32 AM, Joseph C. Neal <joeneal...>
> <joeneal...>> wrote:
> In my comments at Friday's evening's Arkansas Audubon Society meeting in
> Bentonville, I mentioned biologist Rachael Carson and her book, Silent
> Spring. She wrote passionately and factually about the impact of DDT and
> other chemicals on birds, people, and the environment. I have always
> thought the core of her books and beliefs involved alerting Americans to
> how our evolving culture was changing our world, and why we should be
> concerned about it. I thought the central point in Silent Spring was
> relevant 50 years ago, and remains relevant today, even if our
> understanding of some aspects of pesticides and herbicides have changed. I
> told people at the meeting our generation needs more Rachael Carsons. We
> need to keep looking at how we impact the environment -- both the good and
> the bad. It is all relevant.
> I read the review (link below), then went to the "comments" section, and
> was surprised that some people believe Silent Spring was actually the "Mein
> Kampf" of what some view as "enivor-fascists."
> People who think people, birds, and other life forms must equably share
> Earth as our only home -- and don't think Earth is exclusively for humans
> -- are "enviro-fascists"? Who would have thunk a good boy like me raised
> in Fort Smith, democracy, and an upright Southern Baptist home, and played
> high school football, would actually turn out to be an "enviro-fascist"? I
> watch birds and I vote. I'll leave the debate there.
> Here's the article (thanks to Barry Haas for the tip) and be sure and go
> to the "comments" section in order to see if you are also an
> https://www.wsj.com/articles/silent-spring-other-writings-review-the-right-and-wrong-of-rachel-carson-1524777762 >
> <https://www.wsj.com/articles/silent-spring-other-writings-review-the-right-and-wrong-of-rachel-carson-1524777762> > ‘Silent Spring & Other Writings’ Review: The Right and ...
> <https://www.wsj.com/articles/silent-spring-other-writings-review-the-right-and-wrong-of-rachel-carson-1524777762> > www.wsj.com
> It is strange to read Rachel Carson’s “Silent Spring” today, more than 50
> years after its publication, in a handsome new edition from the Library of
> America. At the time the book hit the shelves, it read as a relentless,
> densely factual indictment of the world’s growing use of industrial ...