Date: 4/8/18 7:12 pm From: Paul Plotnick via CTBirds <ctbirds...> Subject: Re: [CT Birds] Acronyms
"Banding codes" belong on leg bands and marginal field notes as were their intended purpose, and in that context, they are commendable. We are ostensibly trying to attract new birders and to use arcane code words is a turnoff for sure. I've received 5 responses so far to my post and all agreed with me. And to imply that using current AOU accepted names for our beloved birds is equivalent to the use of obsolete and archaic names is ridiculous and beneath comment.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 9:54 PM, Steve Mayo and Rebecca Horowitz < <rsdmayo...> wrote:
> Banding codes are a convenient and a very, very easy-to-learn designation. > > My friends go back to birding in CT in the 1930s., but I say, use the > banding codes. > > Anyone who'd like to be quaint can go back to English (Sea Pigeon, > Solander Goose, Crow Duck, Creek duck, Whistler, etc.) -- have at it. > > I like the banding code designations here. > > Steve Mayo > Bethany > > > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Paul Plotnick via CTBirds <ctbirds...> > *To:* CT Birds <ctbirds...> > *Sent:* Sunday, April 8, 2018 8:23 AM > *Subject:* [CT Birds] Acronyms > > This acronym stuff is getting out of HAND. For us old timers who've been > doing this since way before most of you were born, can we please speak > English? Thank you. > > Paul > _______________________________________________ > This list is provided by the Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA) > for the discussion of birds and birding in Connecticut. > For subscription information visit http://lists.ctbirding.org/ > mailman/listinfo/ctbirds_lists.ctbirding.org > > > _______________________________________________ This list is provided by the Connecticut Ornithological Association (COA) for the discussion of birds and birding in Connecticut. For subscription information visit http://lists.ctbirding.org/mailman/listinfo/ctbirds_lists.ctbirding.org