Date: 3/7/17 8:10 am From: Bill Shepherd <stoneax63...> Subject: Re: Advice needed (again) and also Re: What can we do about this?
Excellent point you made with your question about hearing a Wood Thrush sing. That resonates.
Bill Shepherd 2805 Linden, Apt. 3 Little Rock, Arkansas 72205-5964 <Stoneax63...> (501) 375-3918
From: The Birds of Arkansas Discussion List <ARBIRD-L...> on behalf of Karen Garrett <kjgarrett84...>
Sent: Tuesday, March 7, 2017 4:36 AM
Subject: Re: Advice needed (again) and also Re: What can we do about this?
I also sign some of these petitions/letters, etc. I urge anyone who send some of these "form letters" to our congressmen to add at least a couple of sentences on why this is important to you, or at least try to make it personal to these folks. In one letter a year or so ago, I asked Senators Boozman and Cotton if they had ever heard a Wood Thrush sing, and what a shame it would be if our grandchildren, their grandchildren never got to hear one for themselves. Of course I am now on their e-mail, but that's okay. Interestingly enough, Senator Cotton's e-mails go straight to my "spam" folder. Some of you may find that amusing, as I do. Even those that like him would probably find that to be funny. Senator Boozman's e-mails do not go to that file. Go figure.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Carol Joan Patterson <0000003a0ccbe138-dmarc-request...><mailto:<0000003a0ccbe138-dmarc-request...>> wrote:
Jack and all, I sign many petitions, and I believe those posted by the National Audubon Society are particularly relevant. The way to deal with the lead issue, and many many other threats to our birds is to unite. If you haven't already, please take the time to read the message by David Yarnold. I was heartened by these words.
Remember the Fellowship of the Wings list serve? It has been some time since anything has been posted on this discussion list which is dedicated to conservation topics that are verboten on ARBird. While posting is open to anyone on the list, discussions have often been initiated by me. Your responses to these posts have been particularly useful during my term serving on the National Audubon Society Board and have been used to make points at board meetings.
During the January NAS board meeting considerable time was devoted to the topic of how Audubon should respond to the current political situation and especially to the Trump Presidency. The result of those discussions is, in part, reflected in the message below written by David Yarnold. Your thoughts and reactions on this piece, as well as any comments on the comments generated here, would be invaluable to me. Given the makeup of its membership and current national trends, is Audubon on the right track here? Note that Audubon has already come out strongly against the misogyny, racism, and general lack of respect for differences that have been expressed in the recent national discourse.
So can you help me with your reactions? Thank you in advance.
If your in-box looks like mine, you’ve received a lot of email about the administration’s first draft of a budget outline. There’s a lot of bold-faced or bright red type on those emails and they make it sound like the proposed budget cuts are a done deal. Audubon thinks you deserve a more thoughtful response. Those emails would also lead you to believe that an executive order to begin the long process of undoing the Clean Power Plan is the end of the line. In fact, the administration’s budget proposal was designed to generate headlines about living up to campaign promises, but it also divided Americans on core values like clean air and clean water. The executive orders are just the beginning of a years-long process that will test the Audubon network’s commitment to science, community and fairness.
Keep in mind a president’s budget proposal is just that: an opening bid. More details will emerge in the coming weeks. Those details will be debated for months in Congress. As we’ve seen in recent weeks on issues ranging from privatizing public lands to health care, you have a chance as constituents to influence how that budget gets shaped. As the voice of birds, Audubon will be by your side. We’ve worked to protect funding for the places birds need for 111 years—with Democrat and Republican presidents and across party lines in Congress. And in the coming weeks and months, we will work harder than ever with our elected representatives on both sides of the political aisle to make sure we continue to protect the clean air, clean water, and stable climate birds and people need to thrive.
It’s clear that this administration, left unchecked, will fundamentally step back from all of those protections in the name of reducing the role of government. While it’s the nature of bureaucracies to need an occasional pruning, other agendas are at work, serving special interests like big oil and coal as well as the super-wealthy.
Audubon’s leadership chooses to engage with this administration as we have with 28 that preceded it. We simply won’t stand aside while the future of the Arctic Wilderness or Endangered Species Act gets decided. But we’re under no illusions about how hard the fight will be in the face of many in the administration who equate caring conservation with economic hardship. That cynical and, some would say, blasphemous world view is a complete distortion of the values that drove Republicans from Teddy Roosevelt to Richard Nixon to create national parks and bedrock environmental protections.
At every step of the budget process, Audubon—with your continued help and support—will fight to protect funding that’s critical to advancing our conservation work.
You, our diverse members, make us an effective organization—in the communities we call home and in Washington D.C. Your representatives need to hear why funding conservation work is so important to you and to Audubon’s efforts across the country. You can be confident that in the coming weeks and months we will offer you opportunities to raise your powerful voice at the crucial points when it matters most.