First off, thanks for the great Mexican Duck conversation. The take-home
message, at least as I am receiving it, is: Let's get out there and
document Mexican Ducks, candidate Mexican Ducks, Mexican–like ducks, and
whatnot. Brilliant. Bring it on. Together we'll advance our knowledge of
the status & distribution of *diazi* genes in Colorado.
With that out of the way, this, from Tony:
"Finally, a little bit of a deviation from the subject: A plea to birders
to quit using the phrase 'eclipse plumage.' Ducks are no different from all
other Colorado species in conducting a substantial molt as adults after
breeding. There is no reason to call the post-breeding molt of Mallards one
thing and that of Yellow-rumped Warblers... and Spotted Sandpipers,
Bobolinks, Swainson's Hawks, California Gulls, and Lazuli Buntings another
thing. The only real difference is that ducks hold that 'Basic Plumage' for
a much shorter portion of the calendar year. But it's the same molt.'"
So, unless there's been a big recent disclosure that I'm not aware of
(could be!), that's not right. It's *not* the same molt. *Contra*
everything we were taught in the benighted 20th century, the "dull plumage"
(Tony, I'm doing your bidding, but see below 😈) in most Colorado ducks, is
in fact the *alternate* plumage. Not the basic plumage. Here is a link to
Peter Pyle's seminal 2005 paper on the topic:
Okay, now let's talk about that "dull plumage." The eclipse plumage.
(Leukering prepares to commit self-defenestration...) If I'm hearing Tony
right, I fully & completely agree with half of what he is saying, *viz*.,
that it is an excellent idea to understand molts & plumages. For starters,
it's pragmatic: Such knowledge can be valuable in identifying birds to
species. It is also essential for even beginning to attempt to age birds
correctly. (Which, to complete the circle, brings us back to species-level
identification. Because you can't identify summer dowitchers in Colorado
without first knowing how old they are, which requires an assessment of
molts & plumages).
That said, I don't object to the term "eclipse plumage." We have all sorts
of taxon-specific phraseology like that. Hawks have eyries, and herons have
rookeries; but we we don't have similar words, as far as I am aware, for
the nests of shrikes and blackbirds. Formative kittiwakes are tarrocks, and
fledgling turkeys are poults; but we don't have similar words for, say,
loons and woodpeckers. The progeny of *Callipepla squamata* x *C. gambelii*
are Scrambled Quail; but we don't have an analogous name for the hybrid
young of presumptive Mourning x MacGillivray's warbler pairings. Words like
eyrie, tarrock, and Scrambled don't get in the way of understanding "nest,"
"formative," and "hybrid," and I don't think "eclipse" gets in the way of
understanding that the dull plumage of most Colorado waterfowl is,
surprisingly, the alternate plumage.
Ted Floyd
Lafayette, Boulder Co.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To post to this group, send email to <cobirds...>
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cobirds * All posts should be signed with the poster's full name and city. Include bird species and location in the subject line when appropriate.
* Join Colorado Field Ornithologists https://cobirds.org/membership/ ---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobirds+<unsubscribe...>
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/CAGk944cQPaRe%<3D-9_OnJepVBqzUe0_nkegfw1p6SiGhNq507UJA...>
