Date: 9/30/24 9:54 pm From: Nick Lethaby via groups.io <nlethaby...> Subject: Re: [sbcobirding] Tree and brush clearance in euc groves
Ron,
I read the Evergreen proposal and it states they plan to remove the smaller eucs, which would be really bad. Some of the other stuff like removing palms may be OK, depending on whether they are used a lot by nesting orioles.
Nick Lethaby Goleta, CA <nlethaby...> +1 805 284 6200
Sent from Proton Mail Android
-------- Original Message -------- On 9/27/24 3:25 PM, Ron Hirst via groups.io wrote:
> Hi all, I read the proposal for Evergreen and it may or may not be OK. The proposal doesn't really mention or have any focus on birds or migratory birds, or the value of Riparian habitat for wildlife including migratory birds. Riparian birds in general need swaths of habitat, the wider the better, and not denuded habitat. Perhaps the intentions of restoring native habitat and de-hazarding existing vegetation is good, but the studies and viewpoints in this proposal (and perhaps in all the proposals) do not include birds or birders. Thanks for bringing this to the group attention. > Ron Hirst > Santa Barbara > >
